Influencer Credibility and Meme Marketing as Drivers of Sustainability Awareness among Gen Z Consumers in India: A Qualitative Exploration
Abstract
As the digital realm continues to expand, the complexity of modern software ecosystems has increased the frequency and severity of zero-day attacks, causing traditional cyber defence mechanisms to be insufficient. This study examines the role of meme marketing and influencer credibility in shaping sustainability awareness among Generation Z consumers in India. As digital natives increasingly reject traditional advertising in favor of authentic, entertaining content, brands have turned to meme-based strategies to promote environmental consciousness. However, questions remain about whether humor-driven communication can effectively convey serious sustainability messages without being perceived as trivial or inauthentic. Using a qualitative approach combining semi-structured interviews (N=25) and content analysis of 325 memes, this study examines influencer credibility, comprising trustworthiness, expertise, and relatability, significantly mediates meme effectiveness, with micro-influencers outperforming celebrity influencers in driving engagement. The study identifies cultural adaptation as a critical success factor, demonstrating that regionally tailored memes generate 42% higher recall than generic content. While humorous memes increased message sharing by 58%, their impact on actual behavior change was moderated by perceptions of greenwashing. The results contribute to source credibility theory by demonstrating how digital persuasion operates in meme-based sustainability communication, while offering practical guidance for marketers seeking to balance entertainment value with environmental messaging. These insights are particularly valuable for sustainability campaigns targeting young consumers in emerging markets, where digital media consumption patterns differ significantly from Western contexts.
Keywords: Meme Marketing, Influencer Credibility, Sustainability Awareness, Generation Z, Digital Persuasion, India
References
- Abidin, C. (2021). From “authenticity labour” to “platform authenticity”: Micro-celebrities, influencers, and the politics of (mis)trust on social media. International Journal of Cultural Studies, 24(1), 43–59. https://doi.org/10.1177/1367877920953166
- Ballew, M. T., Goldberg, M. H., Rosenthal, S. A., Gustafson, A., & Leiserowitz, A. (2019). Systems thinking as a pathway to global warming beliefs and attitudes through an ecological worldview. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences, 117(12), 6414–6422. https://doi.org/10.1073/pnas.1912326117
- Braun, V., & Clarke, V. (2006). Using thematic analysis in psychology. Qualitative Research in Psychology, 3(2), 77–101. https://doi.org/10.1191/1478088706qp063oa
- Bryman, A. (2016). Social research methods (5th ed.). Oxford University Press.
- Dangelico, R. M. (2017). What drives green product development and how do different antecedents affect market performance? A survey of Italian companies. Journal of Cleaner Production, 112, 287–302. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jclepro.2015.04.060
- De Veirman, M., Cauberghe, V., & Hudders, L. (2017). Marketing through Instagram influencers: The impact of number of followers and product divergence on brand attitude. International Journal of Advertising, 36(5), 798–828. https://doi.org/10.1080/02650487.2017.1348035
- Castillo-Rodríguez, A., Fernández-García, J. C., Chinchilla-Minguet, J. L., & Carnero, E. Á. (2012). Relationship between muscular strength and sprints with changes of direction. The Journal of Strength & Conditioning Research, 26(3), 725-732.
- Hovland, C. I., & Weiss, W. (1951). The influence of source credibility on communication effectiveness. Public Opinion Quarterly, 15(4), 635–650. https://doi.org/10.1086/266350
- Kapoor, K. K., Tamilmani, K., Rana, N. P., Patil, P., Dwivedi, Y. K., & Nerur, S. (2018). Advances in social media research: Past, present and future. Information Systems Frontiers, 20(3), 531–558. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10796-017-9810-y
- Kollmuss, A., & Agyeman, J. (2002). Mind the gap: Why do people act environmentally and what are the barriers to pro-environmental behavior? Environmental Education Research, 8(3), 239–260.
- Krippendorff, K. (2018). Content analysis: An introduction to its methodology (4th ed.). Sage.
- Labrecque, L. I. (2014). Fostering consumer–brand relationships in social media environments: The role of parasocial interaction. Journal of Interactive Marketing, 28(2), 134–148. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.intmar.2013.12.003
- Marwick, A. E. (2022). Morally motivated networked harassment as normative reinforcement. Social media + Society, 8(1), 1–13. https://doi.org/10.1177/20563051211021378
- McCoy, L., Wang, Y. T., & Chi, T. (2021). Why is green marketing a double-edged sword? The role of consumers’ skepticism. Journal of Consumer Marketing, 38(5), 547–560. https://doi.org/10.1108/JCM-11-2020-4207
- Nielsen, J. H., & Thomsen, D. (2018). Sustainability communication and the role of humor. Corporate Communications: An International Journal, 23(2), 158–170. https://doi.org/10.1108/CCIJ-12-2016-0072
- O’Neill, S. (2022). Climate change humor: A coping strategy or trivialization of risk? Environmental Communication, 16(4), 443–459. https://doi.org/10.1080/17524032.2021.2018023
- Ohanian, R. (1992). Construction and validation of a scale to measure celebrity endorsers’ perceived expertise, trustworthiness, and attractiveness. Journal of Advertising, 19(3), 39–52. https://doi.org/10.1080/00913367.1990.10673191
- Speck, P. S., & Elliott, M. T. (1997). Predictors of advertising avoidance in print and broadcast media. Journal of Advertising, 26(3), 61–76. https://doi.org/10.1080/00913367.1997.10673529
- Pornpitakpan, C. (2004). The effect of celebrity endorsers’ perceived credibility on product purchase intention. Journal of International Consumer Marketing, 16, 458–468.
- Rogers, E. M. (2003). Diffusion of innovations (5th ed.). Free Press.
- Schivinski, B., Muntinga, D. G., Pontes, H. M., & Lukasik, P. (2021). Influencing COBRAs: the effects of brand equity on the consumer’s propensity to engage with brand-related content on social media. Journal of Strategic Marketing, 29(1), 1-23. https://doi.org/10.1080/0965254X.2019.1572641
- Seele, P., & Gatti, L. (2015). Greenwashing revisited: In search of a typology and accusation-based definition incorporating legitimacy strategies. Business Strategy and the Environment, 26(2), 239–252. https://doi.org/10.1002/bse.1912
- Sheth, J. N. (2011). Impact of emerging markets on marketing: Rethinking existing perspectives and practices. American Marketing Association, 75(4), 166–182. https://doi.org/10.1509/jmkg.75.4.166
- Smith, A. N., Fischer, E., & Yongjian, C. (2012). How Does Brand-related User-generated Content Differ across YouTube, Facebook, and Twitter?. Journal of Interactive Marketing, 26(2). . https://doi.org/10.1016/j.intmar.2012.01.002
- Tajfel, H., & Turner, J. C. (1979). An integrative theory of intergroup conflict. In W. G. Austin & S. Worchel (Eds.), The social psychology of intergroup relations (pp. 33–47). Brooks/Cole.
- Treen, E., Pitt, L., & Berthon, P. (2021). Social media, slacktivism, and the social causes: How weak ties can still drive change. Business Horizons, 64(2), 243–252. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.bushor.2020.11.001
- Volkmer, I. (2021). Social media and the public sphere: A networked global public. Palgrave Macmillan.