BSMI Cover Page

Business Strategy and Management Insights

eISSN : 3107-7609 | Frequency: Half-yearly

Editor in Chief : Dr. Sushant Kumar Vishnoi

About : Business Strategy and Management Insights is a bi-annual, peer-reviewed, national e-journal that publishes cutting-edge research in the field of Business Strategy and Management. The journal offers a platform for scholars, researchers, and practitioners to share their insights on critical aspects of Read more

Article Metrics
Views : 170 | Downloads: 292
Crossref Citations: Loading...

View in Google Scholar
Dimensions
Altmetric Attention
PlumX:

Fintech and Small Farmers: A Bibliometric Analysis of Current Landscape and Emerging Research Frontiers

  • Rahisha Rahisha Research Scholar Department of Management, SMBS, Jamia Hamdard, New Delhi, India. India ,  
  • Mohammed Jamshed* Mohammed Jamshed Corresponding author Assistant Professor Department of Management, SMBS, Jamia Hamdard, New Delhi. India ,  
  • Waseem Khan Waseem Khan Assistant Professor Dr. Vishwanath Karad MIT World Peace University, Pune. India
Received: July 10, 2025
Accepted: October 16, 2025
Published: December 02, 2025
Volume: 1 (2) | Page: 1-19

Abstract

This study aims at doing comprehensive bibliometric review of scholarly literature on the interface between financial technology (fintech) and smallholder farming. The study examines the research terrain of fintech use among smallholder farmers and determine frontiers of research, annotation the field, and document emerging trends over time. The dataset was obtained for the study from scoups due to its extensive coverage of peer reviewed business, economics, and agriculture journals. The study is grounded on 137 articles which symbolize intellectual structure, prominent authors, thematic patterns, and up-and-coming trends in research from ScientoPy and VOSviewer. The study indicates a staggering explosion of research productivity subsequent to 2020, testifying to growing scholarly interest toward digital financial inclusion in rural economies. Co-citation and co-occurrence analyses also categorized four broad thematic clusters as digital finance and financial inclusion, mobile money adoption among smallholder farmers, sustainability and agri-fintech interface, and socio-economic dimensions like gender and rural development. China, USA, and Ghana ranked as the most productive nations, while journals like PLOS ONE, World Development, and China Agricultural Economic Review has been the primary outlets for publication. The study adds to academic literature by presenting a systematic review of the available studies and providing guidelines for future research, specifically in under-researched fields like gender, digital literacy, and policy regulation. Notably, it also provides insight into how FinTech innovations can assist smallholder farmers by enhancing financial access, productivity, and economic resilience.

Keywords: Fintech, Smallholder farmers, Bibliometric analysis, Mobile money, Agricultural finance, VOSviewer, ScientoPy

References

  1. Abdul‐Rahaman, A., & Abdulai, A. (2022). Mobile money adoption, input use, and farm output among smallholder rice farmers in Ghana. Agribusiness, 38(1), 236-255.
  2. Anshari, M., Almunawar, M. N., Masri, M., & Hamdan, M. (2019). Digital marketplace and FinTech to support agriculture sustainability. Energy Procedia, 156, 234-238.
  3. Aisaiti, G., Liu, L., Xie, J., & Yang, J. (2019). An empirical analysis of rural farmers’ financing intention of inclusive finance in China: The moderating role of digital finance and social enterprise embeddedness. Industrial management & data systems, 119(7), 1535-1563.
  4. Bar-Ilan, J. (2010). Citations to the “Introduction to informetrics” indexed by WOS, Scopus and Google Scholar. Scientometrics, 82(3), 495-506.
  5. Bastian, M., Heymann, S., & Jacomy, M. (2009, March). Gephi: an open source software for exploring and manipulating networks. In Proceedings of the international AAAI conference on web and social media (Vol. 3, No. 1, pp. 361-362).
  6. Batista, C., & Vicente, P. C. (2020). Improving access to savings through mobile money: Experimental evidence from African smallholder farmers. World Development, 129, 104905.
  7. Brooks, S. (2021). Configuring the digital farmer: A nudge world in the making?. Economy and Society, 50(3), 374-396.
  8. Chen, C. (2017). Science mapping: a systematic review of the literature. Journal of data and information science, 2(2).
  9. Demirguc-Kunt, A., Klapper, L., Singer, D., Ansar, S., & Hess, J. (2018). The Global Findex Database 2017: Measuring financial inclusion and the fintech revolution. World Bank Publications.
  10. Díaz, I., Cortey, M., Olvera, À., & Segalés, J. (2016). Use of H-index and other bibliometric indicators to evaluate research productivity outcome on swine diseases. PloS one, 11(3), e0149690.
  11. Donthu, N., Kumar, S., Mukherjee, D., Pandey, N., & Lim, W. M. (2021). How to conduct a bibliometric analysis: An overview and guidelines. Journal of business research, 133, 285-296.
  12. FAO. (2023). Digital Agriculture Report. Food and Agriculture Organization.
  13. Food and Agriculture Organization, F. A. A. O. (2017). The state of food and agriculture 2017: leveraging food systems for inclusive rural transformation.
  14. Forbes. (2023). Fintech solutions for climate resilience in agriculture. Retrieved from https://www.forbes.com
  15. Frimpong, S. E., Agyapong, G., & Agyapong, D. (2022). Financial literacy, access to digital finance and performance of SMEs: Evidence From Central region of Ghana. Cogent Economics & Finance, 10(1), 2121356.
  16. Gao, Q., Cheng, C., Sun, G., & Li, J. (2022). The impact of digital inclusive finance on agricultural green total factor productivity: Evidence from China. Frontiers in Ecology and Evolution, 10, 905644.
  17. Hinson, R., Lensink, R., & Mueller, A. (2019). Transforming agribusiness in developing countries: SDGs and the role of FinTech. Current Opinion in Environmental Sustainability, 41, 1-9.
  18. Jack, W., & Suri, T. (2014). Risk sharing and transactions costs: Evidence from Kenya's mobile money revolution. American Economic Review, 104(1), 183-223.
  19. Kamilaris, A., Fonts, A., & Prenafeta-Boldύ, F. X. (2019). The rise of blockchain technology in agriculture and food supply chains. Trends in food science & technology, 91, 640-652.
  20. Kikulwe, E. M., Fischer, E., & Qaim, M. (2014). Mobile money, smallholder farmers, and household welfare in Kenya. PloS one, 9(10), e109804.
  21. Kshetri, N. (2017). Blockchain's roles in strengthening cybersecurity and protecting privacy. Telecommunications policy, 41(10), 1027-1038.
  22. Liu, Y., Liu, C., & Zhou, M. (2021). Does digital inclusive finance promote agricultural production for rural households in China? Research based on the Chinese family database (CFD). China Agricultural Economic Review, 13(2), 475-494.
  23. Market Data Forecast. (2024). Fintech Market Size, Share, Analysis & Growth Report, 2033. Retrieved from https://www.marketdataforecast.com
  24. Mapanje, O., Karuaihe, S., Machethe, C., & Amis, M. (2023). Financing sustainable agriculture in sub-saharan africa: a review of the role of financial technologies. Sustainability, 15(5), 4587.
  25. Mehrabi, Z., McDowell, M. J., Ricciardi, V., Levers, C., Martinez, J. D., Mehrabi, N. & Jarvis, A. (2021). The global divide in data-driven farming. Nature Sustainability, 4(2), 154-160.
  26. Omokhoa, H. E., Odionu, C. S., Azubuike, C., & Sule, A. K. (2024). AI-powered fintech innovations for credit scoring, debt recovery, and financial access in microfinance and SMEs. Gulf Journal of Advance Business Research, 2(6), 411-422.
  27. Page, M. J., McKenzie, J. E., Bossuyt, P. M., Boutron, I., Hoffmann, T. C., Mulrow, C. D., ... & Moher, D. (2021). The PRISMA 2020 statement: an updated guideline for reporting systematic reviews. bmj, 372.
  28. Pandey, D. K. (2025). FinTech and small and medium enterprises: current state and future directions. The TQM Journal.
  29. Ruiz-Rosero, J., Ramírez-González, G., & Viveros-Delgado, J. (2019). Software survey: ScientoPy, a scientometric tool for topics trend analysis in scientific publications. Scientometrics, 121(2), 1165-1188.
  30. Saini, S., & Chowdhury, A. (2023). India’s small and marginal farmer. Arcus Policy Research. Retrieved from https://arcusresearch.in
  31. Sanga, B., & Aziakpono, M. (2023). FinTech and SMEs financing: A systematic literature review and bibliometric analysis. Digital Business, 3(2), 100067.
  32. Sharma, A., Mohan, A., Johri, A., & Asif, M. (2025). Determinants of financial technology (FinTech) adoption by the farmers in agrarian economy. Social Sciences & Humanities Open, 11, 101370.
  33. Sharma, S. K., Ilavarasan, P. V., & Karanasios, S. (2024). Small businesses and FinTech: A systematic review and future directions. Electronic Commerce Research, 24(1), 535–575. 10.1007/s10660-023-09705-5
  34. Sekabira, H., & Qaim, M. (2017). Mobile money, agricultural marketing, and off-farm income in Uganda. Agricultural Economics, 48(5), 597–611. https://doi.org/10.1111/agec.12360
  35. Small, H. (1973). Co‐citation in the scientific literature: A new measure of the relationship between two documents. Journal of the American Society for information Science, 24(4), 265-269.
  36. Song, K., Tang, Y., Zang, D., Guo, H., & Kong, W. (2022). Does digital finance increase relatively large-scale farmers’ agricultural income through the allocation of production factors? Evidence from China. Agriculture, 12(11), 1915. https://doi.org/10.3390/agriculture12111915
  37. Sood, S. K., Kumar, N., & Saini, M. (2021). Scientometric analysis of literature on distributed vehicular networks: VOSViewer visualization techniques. Artificial Intelligence Review, 1-33.
  38. Suri, T., & Jack, W. (2016). The Long-Run Poverty and Gender Impacts of Mobile Money. Science, 354, 1288-1292. https://doi.org/10.1126/science.aah5309
  39. Touch, V., Tan, D. K., Cook, B. R., Li Liu, D., Cross, R., Tran, T. A. & Cowie, A. (2024). Smallholder farmers’ challenges and opportunities: Implications for agricultural production, environment and food security. Journal of Environmental Management, 370, 122536.
  40. Van Eck, N. J., & Waltman, L. (2017). VOSviewer manual version 1.6. 6. Leiden, The Netherlands: Universiteit Leiden.
  41. Van Eck, N., & Waltman, L. (2009). Software survey: VOSviewer, a computer program for bibliometric mapping. scientometrics, 84(2), 523-538.
  42. Vieira, E. S., & Gomes, J. A. (2009). A comparison of Scopus and Web of Science for a typical university. Scientometrics, 81, 587-600.
  43. Wang, S. (2021). Online Learning Behavior Analysis Based on Image Emotion Recognition. Traitement Du Signal, 38, 865-873. https://doi.org/10.18280/ts.380333
  44. Yu, Y., Li, Y., Zhang, Z., Gu, Z., Zhong, H., Zha, Q., & Chen, E. (2020). A bibliometric analysis using VOSviewer of publications on COVID-19. Annals of translational medicine, 8(13), 816.
  45. Yang, Y., Qi, C., Gu, Y., & Fang, G. (2024). Use efficiency, reduction potential, and effects of fertilizers on carbon emissions in China’s major citrus regions.
  46. Zhao, P., Zhang, W., Cai, W., & Liu, T. (2022). The impact of digital finance use on sustainable agricultural practices adoption among smallholder farmers: An evidence from rural China. Environmental Science and Pollution Research, 29(26), 39281-39294.
Recently Cited By
Loading citations...
Citation copied to clipboard
×
Cite this Article