Analysing the Impact of Consumer Behaviour on Sustainable Purchasing Decisions and Its Role in Fostering Responsible Consumption under SDG 12: A Structural Equation Modeling Approach
Abstract
Purpose: The aim of this study is to investigate the factors influencing sustainable purchasing behaviour in accordance with Sustainable Development Goal (SDG 12) emphasizing the impact of psychological, social and cognitive elements on sustainable purchase intentions and actual purchase intentions and actual purchasing actions. The study enhances the Theory of Planned Behaviour (TPB) by including environmental concern and environmental knowledge as fundamental roots.
Design/ Methodology/ Approach: A quantitative cross sectional survey methodology was employed. Data were gathered from 245 participants utilizing a standardised questionnaire employing five-point Likert scale. The interrelation among constructs were analysed utilizing Partial Least Square Structural Equation Modelling (PLS-SEM) with SmartPLS 4. The examination of the measurement model encompassed reliability and validity tests whereas structural correlations were analysed by bootstrapping with 5000 resamples.
Findings: The findings demonstrate that environmental awareness, concern, attitude towards sustainable items, perceived behavioural control and subjective norms strongly affect the intention to purchase sustainably. Moreover, the intention to shop sustainably is a robust predictor of actual sustainable purchasing behaviour. The model has robust explanatory capability and satisfactory fit. However, gap between intention and behaviour remains signifying that positive intentions may not invariably results in actual purchases due to external limitations such as expenses, accessibility and convenience.
Implication: The research offers actionable insights for policymaker, marketers and educators to promote sustainable consumption via awareness initiatives, enhanced accessibility and supporting regulatory structures.
Originality/ Value: The study enhances the Theory of Planned Behaviour by incorporating environmental factors and experimentally substantiates a comprehensive model of sustainable consumption behaviour within the framework of Sustainable Development Goal 12.
Keywords: Sustainable Consumption, Theory of Planned Behaviour, Environmental Knowledge, Sustainable Purchase Intention, Sustainable Behaviour.
References
- Ajzen, I. (2011). The theory of planned behaviour: Reactions and reflections. Psychology & Health, 26(9), 1113–1127. https://doi.org/10.1080/08870446.2011.613995
- Anderson, J. C., & Gerbing, D. W. (1988). Structural equation modeling in practice: A review and recommended two-step approach. Psychological Bulletin, 103(3), 411–423. https://doi.org/10.1037/0033- 2909.103.3.411
- Bagozzi, R. P., & Yi, Y. (1988). On the evaluation of structural equation models. Journal of the Academy of Marketing Science, 16(1), 74–94. https://doi.org/10.1007/BF02723327
- Bray, J., Johns, N., & Kilburn, D. (2011). An exploratory study into the factors impeding ethical consumption. Journal of Business Ethics, 98(4), 597–608. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10551-010-0640-9
- Carrington, M. J., Neville, B. A., & Whitwell, G. J. (2010). Why ethical consumers don’t walk their talk: Towards a framework for understanding the gap between the ethical purchase intentions and actual buying behaviour of ethically minded consumers. Journal of Business Ethics, 97(1), 139–158. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10551-010-0501-6
- Cayaban, C. J. G., Prasetyo, Y. T., Persada, S. F., Borres, R. D., Gumasing, M. J. J., & Nadlifatin, R. (2023). The influence of social media and sustainability advocacy on the purchase intention of Filipino consumers in fast fashion. Sustainability, 15(11), 8502. https://doi.org/10.3390/su15118502
- Čapienė, A., Rūtelionė, A., & Krukowski, K. (2022). Engaging in sustainable consumption: Exploring the influence of environmental attitudes, values, personal norms, and perceived responsibility. Sustainability, 14(16), 10290. https://doi.org/10.3390/su141610290
- Chen, M. F. (2016). Extending the theory of planned behavior model to explain people’s energy savings and carbon reduction behavioral intentions: to mitigate climate change in Taiwan-moral obligation matters. Journal of Cleaner Production, 112, 1746–1753. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jclepro.2015.07.043
- Chenavaz, R. Y., & Dimitrov, S. (2024). From waste to wealth: Policies to promote the circular economy. Journal of Cleaner Production, 443, 141086. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jclepro.2024.141086
- Chin, W. W. (1998). The partial least squares approach to structural equation modeling. In G. A. Marcoulides (Ed.), Modern methods for business research (pp. 295–336). Psychology Press.
- Cohen, J. (1988). Statistical power analysis for the behavioral sciences (2nd ed.). Routledge.
- Cronbach, L. J. (1951). Coefficient alpha and the internal structure of tests. Psychometrika, 16(3), 297–334. https://doi.org/10.1007/BF02310555
- Egan, M. (2017). An analysis of Richard H. Thaler and Cass R. Sunstein's Nudge: improving decisions about health, wealth and happiness. Macat Library.
- Eze, U. C., & Ndubisi, N. O. (2013). Green buyer behavior: Evidence from Asia consumers. Journal of Asian and African Studies, 48(4), 413–426. https://doi.org/10.1177/0021909613493602
- Fornell, C., & Larcker, D. F. (1981). Evaluating structural equation models with unobservable variables and measurement error. Journal of Marketing Research, 18(1), 39–50.
- Gefen, D., Straub, D., & Boudreau, M. C. (2000). Structural equation modeling and regression: Guidelines for research practice. Communications of the Association for Information Systems, 4(1), 1–77. https://doi.org/10.17705/1CAIS.00407
- Gera, R., Chadha, P., Banerjee, S. P., Sharma, M., Pandey, A. K., Kampani, S., Dixit, S., Tummala, S. K., & Gatea, M. A. (2023). A narrative review on use of biomaterials in achieving SDG 9: Build resilient infrastructure, promote sustainable industrialization and foster innovation. In E3S Web of Conferences, 391, 01180. EDP Sciences. https://doi.org/10.1051/e3sconf/202339101180
- Giurco, D. (2020). Ensure sustainable consumption and production patterns. In Mining, materials, and the sustainable development goals (SDGs) (pp. 117-124). CRC Press.
- Grewal, D., Hulland, J., Kopalle, P. K., & Karahanna, E. (2020). The future of technology and marketing: A multidisciplinary perspective. Journal of the Academy of Marketing Science, 48(1), 1– 8. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11747-019-00711-4
- Joshi, Y., Uniyal, D. P., & Sangroya, D. (2021). Investigating consumers’ green purchase intention: Examining the role of economic value, emotional value and perceived marketplace influence. Journal of Cleaner Production, 328, 129638. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jclepro.2021.129638
- Jung, H. J., Choi, Y. J., & Oh, K. W. (2020). Influencing factors of Chinese consumers’ purchase intention to sustainable apparel products: Exploring consumer “attitude–behavioral intention” gap. Sustainability, 12(5), 1770. https://doi.org/10.3390/su12051770
- Khandelwal, M., Sharma, A., & Jain, V. (2019). Greenwashing: A study on the effects of greenwashing on consumer perception and trust build-up. Research Review International Journal of Multidisciplinary, 4(1), 607-612.
- Lee, E. J., Bae, J., & Kim, K. H. (2020). The effect of environmental cues on purchase intention of sustainable products. Journal of Business Research, 120, 425–433. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jbusres.2019.10.048
- Lehner, M., Mont, O., & Heiskanen, E. (2016). Nudging – A promising tool for sustainable consumption behaviour? Journal of Cleaner Production, 134, 166–177. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jclepro.2015.11.086
- Matharu, M., Jain, R., & Kamboj, S. (2020). Understanding the impact of lifestyle on sustainable consumption behavior: a sharing economy perspective. Management of environmental quality: An international Journal, 32(1), 20-40. https://doi.org/10.1108/MEQ-02-2020-0036
- Miele, Y., Esposito, G., Ricciardi, M., Faggiano, A., Pulselli, F. M., Marchettini, N., Motta, O., & Proto, A. (2024). Multiuse polystyrene plates for phasing out single-use plastics: Chemical Performances and Environmental Impact Assessment Through a Life Cycle Approach. Advanced Energy and Sustainability Research, 5(7), 2300224.
- Nath, V., & Agrawal, R. (2023). Barriers to consumer adoption of sustainable products-an empirical analysis. Social Responsibility Journal, 19(5), 858–884. https://doi.org/10.1108/SRJ-12-2020-0495
- OECD. (2008). Promoting sustainable consumption: Good practices in OECD countries. OECD Publishing, Paris, https://doi.org/10.1787/351d2dc6-en
- Park, H. J., & Lin, L. M. (2020). Exploring attitude–behavior gap in sustainable consumption: Comparison of recycled and upcycled fashion products. Journal of Business Research, 117, 623–628. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jbusres.2018.08.025
- Patel, J., Modi, A., & Paul, J. (2017). Pro-environmental behavior and socio-demographic factors in an emerging market. Asian Journal of Business Ethics, 6(2), 189–214. https://doi.org/10.1007/s13520-016-0071-5
- Poškus, M. S. (2016). Using social norms to encourage sustainable behaviour: A meta-analysis. Psichologija, 53, 23–40.
- Reisch, L. A., Cohen, M. J., Thøgersen, J., & Tukker, A. (2016). Frontiers in sustainable consumption research. GAIA-Ecological Perspectives for Science and Society, 25(4), 234–240. https://doi.org/10.14512/gaia.25.4.4
- Ruiz-Real, J. L., Uribe-Toril, J., Gázquez-Abad, J. C., & de Pablo Valenciano, J. (2019). Sustainability and retail: Analysis of global research. Sustainability, 11(1), 14. https://doi.org/10.3390/su11010014
- Saracevic, S., & Schlegelmilch, B. B. (2021). The impact of social norms on pro-environmental behavior: A systematic literature review of the role of culture and self-construal. Sustainability, 13(9), 5156.
- Sarstedt, M., Ringle, C. M., & Hair, J. F. (2021). Partial least squares structural equation modeling. In Handbook of market research (pp. 587-632). Cham: Springer International Publishing. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-57413-4_15
- Shehawy, Y. M., & Khan, S. M. F. A. (2024). Consumer readiness for green consumption: The role of green awareness as a moderator of the relationship between green attitudes and purchase intentions. Journal of Retailing and Consumer Services, 78, 103739. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jretconser.2024.103739
- Strähle, J., & Gräff, C. (2017). The role of social media for a sustainable consumption. In Green fashion retail (pp. 225-247). Springer, Singapore. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-981-10-2440-5_12
- Teichmann, F. M. J., Wittmann, C., & Sergi, B. S. S. (2023). What are the consequences of corporate greenwashing? A look into the consequences of greenwashing in consumer and financial markets.
- Journal of Information, Communication and Ethics in Society , 21(3), 290-301. https://doi.org/10.1108/JICES-10-2022-0090
- Wu, L., & Liu, Z. (2022). Influence of green marketing on brand trust: The mediation role of brand image and the moderation effect of greenwash. Discrete Dynamics in Nature and Society, 2022, 1–10. https://doi.org/10.1155/2022/6392172
